The company bases its efficiency on the unity and cohesion of all its members. No matter the economic, cultural, geographical or otherwise, the result always be beneficial for those who keep society running.
Throughout history has created an awareness of society in which the acceptance of human beings began to the hand that had control of God. Gradually this circle of "human friendships" was growing in such a way that generated a large group of humans who maintained control through religion and inevitably with the power that gave him the god of earthly possessions giver. No wonder, therefore, that the lives that were in their hands have no value, were not even human.
To achieve the humanization of all members of society begin to wonder who is free and what rights. Classes start wars and fight to end slavery. Achieve the humanization was the end of non-democracy.
god credits were gone. The debt is huge, a whole world for their goods that are controlled by a few winners.
Now, who inherited these credits must struggle to avoid losing them. Citizens, which are human, free and rights, agree to live in society and organized. This will require establishing performance standards, and are best adapted to the new reality that has always worked: delegate to God the future. continue working with this premise states a greater or lesser extent.
But something does not work, what happens in an integrated human society is unable to achieve their goals?
Society is enclosed within a herrático and disproportionate. Treat humans as raw material, does not consider the system weakens or strengthens the position of some humans against others. The laws are becoming painful and perverse in state hands.
The state does not accept the humanity, all human differences that make it diverse.
The state creates a blank slate where to measure and blame the vast majority of humans. There are just laws condemn as much money to different persons without considering the effect of the penalty for each person. Laws dehumanize society.
Thus, society can only humanize gaining control of the laws, observing, recollecting, discussing, motivating, evolving the state with the law through social contact.
society (human) is aware of it, but compromised the future of those who control governments and markets. Thus, allowing for time to time decide who represents us is more beneficial than leaving decisions in the hands of citizens, ordinary human.
The power required to have control, the longer and longer in control without interference from the citizens most beneficial to the ruling class.
Direct Democracy solves many of these "undesirable damage", the government remains vigilant, and at the same time, the state is consistent with the public. Citizens can act to make changes to laws that do not like, and at the same time, there are laws that can not be done (for example, changes in the constitution) if not through public consultation.
But there remain major fronts where no direct democracy can work.
Direct Democracy is the format in which the state establishes a connection with citizens, allowing them to correct the bad behavior of governments. Direct Democracy offers a safe way to verify and unite social consciousness, creating the possibility of generating the necessary discussions to find the best solution to a problem by all citizens. The format of Direct Democracy needs to use time properly, giving enough time period so that you can generate discussion in society. However
today is a time lag. The time needed by the government to use the power of negative and the time that a democracy has to counter is a huge gap, even in a direct democracy. The same tool that offers a guarantee of properly functioning direct democracy is that which obstructs the social efficiency of a bad government: time. Today, time is key. The world is moving at breakneck speed, requires only a few days or weeks to change the course of a government without citizen involvement.
To this we must add the evolution cultural society facing the state and the established government. You need to understand that society is the fruit of the culture of its peoples. Therefore, people who have little experience with democracy will be more reticent and reluctant movement to people with high self-governing democratic experience. This does not mean they do not know to decide. This decision leads to fear, a people who have suffered from authoritarianism is a prisoner of fear to think, but he knows what he wants. Thus, self-confidence, self esteem, motivation, and ultimately, social and political culture of the people must move forward to not be afraid to make decisions, to engage in self-government. Here
we have one of the biggest challenges: getting society to speak without fear through its citizens.
Direct Democracy is an indispensable step to achieve that purpose, but we are still awaiting the final step to perform: instant self-government.
is easy to think that it is impossible to reach this kind of self-government. It is easy to believe that direct democracy is the ultimate goal of a democracy. But getting the company rise, ensuring that society is alive politically, in short: get a Living Democracy, is a goal that is within the scope of this world.
now in the XXI century we have the tool fundamental uncensored information instantly through the network of networks, internet.
capture options for self-government are viable, the benefits are for all the disadvantages for those who lose control of the government, politicians and financial markets.
0 comments:
Post a Comment