Democracies and votes
The effective democratic development based on mutual cooperation of members of society. To this end, the company provides various means of communication in both directions to be continually recreated. When a party fails to deliver is lost the connection and goes democratic collaboration.
Therefore, the more communication between both parties there will be more entrenched democracy. If you believe a democracy can work together with citizens once every four years versus one capable of doing it once a week, it is clear that the latter will be more democratic and more social than the first.
citizens as members of democracy are the engine of democracy, but what happens when the government is inhibited from working with people? What happens when people are inhibited from working in government?
First question: what happens when the government is inhibited from working with people?
create a democracy is dictatorship. The objectives of the government are no longer the need for citizens. The government lost the social purpose with which he was born. When you try to citizen inquiries compromising the answer, do simple queries so that the citizen is locked in its decision and break the communication channel. To destroy government communication with citizens is an economic gain.
Second question: what happens when people are inhibited from working in government?
First, you lose the social debate, the government ceases to be objective in their thinking and only sees the economic success of society as a democratic goal. This could be further from the initial social objective of any democracy. Then, citizens (due to lack of social recognition from the government) see a democratic setback, attend to a loss of freedoms and rights and choose to follow the democratic path without access to government. The people cut off communication with the government and act outside of it. Even when respondents have access to respond. For a city to destroy the communication with the government represents a separation of his captors, is a freedom without constraints.
The right to non-voting
Thus we see that today's democracies lose their efficiency in the attempt to access the city, but there is no flip side, there is no loss of government benefits, in contrast, always give loss of connection as a social problem and not a government problem. Not so in the city, the city acquired in the non-voting the right to freedom, not to feel a captive of a government that believes in solving basic problems for society and citizens.
PIRATA movement and the right to non-voting.
In PIRATA complicate things, we have channels to ensure that representatives did not cut the connection with citizens, we have considered not only the voters of PIRATA is accusing the rights and freedoms we defend, but we believe that the rights and freedoms that every human being (see Universal Declaration of Human Rights ) representation obtained as a benefit for society. PIRATE never be inhibited social contact. Social contact is the target of pirates, their movement.
PIRATA have broken in the pursuit of a manifesto (translated economically) in the achievement of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a social stronghold. The ultimate purpose of PIRATA is to be in government, is only a tool to make the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is imposed as a democratic order.
And this has led to the first sociological problem unresolved. The distance to the citizens, their passivity in politics. We intend to create a mutual partnership with the city (some would call Direct Democracy, Democracy other fluids, etc..) And we know we must go beyond that barrier with which we have found to achieve our goals. Now begins our struggle: to get society to get involved with PIRATA social objectives. PIRATA is not intended to govern election effort. We know that one of the possible angles of PIRATA is to organize society (even outside of the polls) to sue and get a functioning democracy in all its aspects and everyday moments of all citizens.
Our first hurdle was the lack of internal motivation, in other organizations make up for the lack of motivation to a large degree of freedom in the head of the party. In PIRATA always room for maneuver is democracy. So we are at a moment that will be a major effort to revive itself within PIRATA PIRATA.
Now, we are investing the effort in getting PIRATA in democratic tools democratic deactivate inhibition of the members of PIRATA. For this, the first question that it is: How to get the right to non-vote does not become a brake on democracy?
The right to non-voting is an act that every citizen must be maintained. No system can void the no-vote. Eliminate the right to non-voting means eliminating the right to live according to their conscience. PIRATE
the solution should focus on preventing the brake that is the right to non-voting, but to replicate in the system the right to non-voting as an integral and positive, and thus citizen trying to get what is wrong and what is damaging to the system in order to reconsider the mistakes and correct them.
First, it established that while all else fails, the right to non-voting to be inalienable, can not be canceled or punish the non-voting right.
As a second point of action might be possible to define all the possible voting options to understand social forms of life in society. Not all see the same need for action in the ratings, nor are all dressed alike, nor do we have the same need for food, medicine, art, etc.. Everyone is different. And this differentiation is the union of all, respect for that distinction is what democracy will evolve positively in PIRATE. The attraction of any person for the right to non-voting is even a lack of social incentives in the system, getting to combine in different views to vote and consequently that such misfortunes are reflected in the social movement would be a major task to stop the no-vote in a democratic society established.
third point, note that when a motion PIRATA full range of variables defined within democratic citizens any action that inhibits the contact will be, paradoxically, the social death of PIRATA. And would be seen as a third point attempt reconnection to the social order, to return to recover the link with the city.
insist that is not a social problem, not even the city, but loss of contact between the movement PIRATA and the public. Wake
social connection.
There is only one way to revive the social connection: with social contact. Reactivation
social contact is one of the priority tasks of PIRATE at this time.
Once again we get in touch with society and bring them back to hear their proposals through our channels, we will only verify that the communication has been restored successfully. This has re-der to be through exchange of information. Reset
voting system as austere as possible, join forces in the city feel comfortable exercising their right to vote, and finally getting to accept social dialogue between pirates and the public.
democracies are not exercising their right to vote is considered an attack on democracy, ranging from simple disrespect of not complying with an inalienable right, to lose social rights or economic penalties.
I do not believe in such aspects. The right to no-vote is the right to strike. When all else fails we can only sit back, and if he has control criminalize us to act in this way then we no longer have neither the freedom to think.
vote or not vote: the same right
ends here, for the speech. Get the citizen vote will only be possible if you get with it a benefit. Getting
vote without social constraints, is also an exercise in democracy and tolerance.
and access your vote casting as a receipt of social identity is the difference between a democracy a democracy alive and dead within a government intolerance in their laws.
be receptive to the vote. Accept the critical vote, one that tells us what is wrong, accept in the voting comments or complaints. Accept the positive feedback that indicates that the system works but has no desire to decide, which focuses on the continuity of the system, with changes that other citizens freely decide. Internet
us about individuality in the set. Accept all aspects of the vote will give us the strength to continue fighting for democracy.
: ·)
0 comments:
Post a Comment