create societies governments to achieve common goals for all citizens: to live. Make no mistake, the companies do not create governments for war but peace.
Therefore, the cost on citizens to be left to govern: to assume defeat, to negotiate life. Today
no government bankruptcy. I'm bold, I know. To begin we must understand what the government rather than treasure, after that, we can assess your situation.
The evolution of societies has been marking as the power has been stabilizing and anchoring through one of the most immutable properties exist today: the gold. Thus, there is collective awareness that "money" (gold currency) is the foundation of society and state, in short, the tool of governments.
Since children have learned to value our possessions, we know that when we borrow and we can not return it we are doomed to oblivion and disappearance, social death. And under this premise we all parameters with which we assess our environment and actions.
So why governments fail? Why not get out of his supposed final crisis?
will have to attend several parameters, the first money. Governments are fuzzy entities (although unfortunately there are usually always the same faces) designed to survive all disasters. They must buy their survival as individuals, but not with the same currency as the latter. Governments buy their survival money. They must keep the system afloat monetary bankruptcy, how to get there to the extent of the crisis and even a little more, to come out stronger. Monetary relations are really simple: there are individuals with little money and financial markets are a lot of money. Governments should ensure that only the balance is always in favor of financial markets, adding their coffers.
The flow of money must be kept from the bottom (low purchasing power) up (financial markets), thus creating a steady flow of money in little hands. It is not that bad or good, but it has a little problem: the gold of the planet is limited. Therefore, maintaining the current down / up the money at the rate which the company can generate profits do go bankrupt social system (understood as all citizens and not as a system of government.) To get to the root of the problem we must understand how it survives the money in the hands of citizens or the financial markets.
begin at the bottom. People in their environment generate social stability (and I said that people need to be living socially), create a stable and secure environment on their terms (cultural factors involved here), once established social environment safely, is when evolve to the next point. At this point social being becomes a being a consumer, which activates the society through the exchange of goods. People engaged in a movement in society, that is the basis of an active and without crisis.
and above. Financial markets need to hoard money. Its structure is maintained with the flow of money. Having money is not his destiny. The fate of the financial markets is always cumulative. Financial markets do not spend, do not buy. Financial markets use markets to draw from them social benefits, income. Even charge for their action to reap the benefits of society. But all legal huh? No censorship, no drugs, no money laundering, corruption-free planning, without ecological bankruptcy. All legal, again. As I was saying, having money is not his destiny, his destiny is to have the entire market. Therefore, the need for the market (the money is only the tool) should maintain control of the tools (money) and not lose control of it. This can only be achieved in one way: remove the money from the social flow. When one gram of gold falls hands of the financial market and does not return to "down" to the underworld of people.
At this point I can finish the approach: the social crisis is determined by the loss of benefits in people, this implies an excess of profit in financial markets, a enquilosamiento of power in few hands. No retreat. The output of the social crisis disappears just as society itself is capable of self-generating a new feasible to generate profits. Financial markets are not those who do, are simple people, these people like the reader who only understand to survive.
And now we come to governments. I was saying earlier that governments are not in crisis. I know that all (Or nearly all) are already hands on the head (crazy!). Governments are not marketed with money. Governments marketed with human lives. Governments sell life and its benefits. A government's hands are nothing but ignorant voters, cannon fodder, mob, in short: the pen from which to draw benefits.
A government hands are a raw material, yes, with power to create profit.
Knowing that we are a raw material, the government is left alone to get the most benefit from it. Interestingly, the more feeds the machine that runs the government (officials) is less resistance to social brokenness. So the more "socialist" is a more controlled society has the forces of change. But make no mistake, the more "capitalist" more control you have over the citizens' purchasing power. Thus, both extremes are detrimental to the evolution of a balanced society for citizens.
We find the average.
and employment, governments can not control the job because successful sacrifice by citizens, success through financial markets. And sooner or later, financial markets, engulf the employment benefits that keep moving.
If there is money in the hands of citizens is employment, if the money is moving to monopolies, corporations, ultimately, into the financial markets, then it destroys jobs.
government's currency (as we know) are people. Governments are not in crisis because they still have to create a corral full benefits.
The crisis is in every single citizen. The government only tries to allowing people into the corral.
: ·) elferrer 09/01/2010
0 comments:
Post a Comment