Democracy is fragile very difficult to get and very little to destroy. Not only is destroyed by direct attacks (coups, civil wars, ...) but also through the loss of their values.
is lawful for certain countries to avoid the destruction of democracy, to use some tools to guarantee the individual right to decide and defend the right to non-voting. It is permissible because it prevents democracy from falling into disuse and disappear. However, the damage it creates in the individual can not be seen in the long term. Thus, individuals end up receiving the obligation to vote as inherent to democracy, strengthen the image of citizens required a parallel between obligation to vote and submission. This damage is imperceptible and goes beyond the democratic or social functioning. It's a psychological damage on the individual, in which he reacts to democracy as against a parent who will never leave you out of the rules. Prohibits individuals from social experimentation, prohibits the development of democracy from individuals, generating (therefore) entropy and limited to only one type of democratic possibility captive. I imagine that those countries will require the vote scheduled every 30 or 50 years (for example) the public vote again to accept that obligation, if not creates an inbreeding in such a democracy, cut evolution. I'm not saying they are not more evolved than others, only that they are stuck.
I remember once I said that the cultural mix is \u200b\u200bthe evolution of peoples. Is there a cultural mix in the country? Sure, says the mix of immigration and evolution, says the evolution of both the country's internal cultures as cultures from other countries. The country evolves with cultural identity. Democracy and benefits enjoyed by citizens. In the mix is \u200b\u200bthe evolution. PIRATE
advocates human rights of all citizens. Internally we have democracy, we use democratic standards to work and evolve gradually as a result.
But we have a misconception, and we will correct it. There is a misconception. There is a statutory error. Not a single error. No group is wrong. It is an evolutionary error.
base our decisions on the work of the members. That's right. We are sympathetic figure for those people who watch our behavior, not daring to engage in daily functioning. It is a common reaction in all societies.
This social power base by supporters as the first entry is key to understanding the way in which democracy walks, to know address social needs of democracy.
And yet, we are not paying attention. That must change. We
group of members who build their time effort and money the future of PIRATA. And we also have a group of supporters who can tell us where we are, as we sail and what direction. Just outside you can see our progress. From within our vision of a one-way and with little depth. We get lost in the immensity.
We use the external links, the supporters, to know what we are doing, what we are failing, and what should be our priorities.
The construction of our statutes is strong, takes care of us losing the strength of democracy and keeps us and dilapidated enthroned ourselves. Is an asset that we must take care with the utmost respect. We create queries
constant supporters, asking what's wrong with our system, to be critical of ourselves, activate all the mechanisms of democratic development.
0 comments:
Post a Comment