1998 Ford Escort Hard Start Ruff Idle

first point of sale Onyx 4

magazine creation ONYX No. 4 is now on sale in Book CIRO

( Playgrounds of the Faculty of Arts and Humanities and Social Sciences )

acercártenos If you were afraid of the recitals and to purchase a copy, now there is no excuse. Cyrus, the oldest bookseller Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, waiting for you ...

* Photography: Lima Gris

How Does The Bugatti Veyron Engine Work

more democracy, more development and votes Democracies

Democracy is fragile very difficult to get and very little to destroy. Not only is destroyed by direct attacks (coups, civil wars, ...) but also through the loss of their values.

is lawful for certain countries to avoid the destruction of democracy, to use some tools to guarantee the individual right to decide and defend the right to non-voting. It is permissible because it prevents democracy from falling into disuse and disappear. However, the damage it creates in the individual can not be seen in the long term. Thus, individuals end up receiving the obligation to vote as inherent to democracy, strengthen the image of citizens required a parallel between obligation to vote and submission. This damage is imperceptible and goes beyond the democratic or social functioning. It's a psychological damage on the individual, in which he reacts to democracy as against a parent who will never leave you out of the rules. Prohibits individuals from social experimentation, prohibits the development of democracy from individuals, generating (therefore) entropy and limited to only one type of democratic possibility captive. I imagine that those countries will require the vote scheduled every 30 or 50 years (for example) the public vote again to accept that obligation, if not creates an inbreeding in such a democracy, cut evolution. I'm not saying they are not more evolved than others, only that they are stuck.

I remember once I said that the cultural mix is \u200b\u200bthe evolution of peoples. Is there a cultural mix in the country? Sure, says the mix of immigration and evolution, says the evolution of both the country's internal cultures as cultures from other countries. The country evolves with cultural identity. Democracy and benefits enjoyed by citizens. In the mix is \u200b\u200bthe evolution. PIRATE

advocates human rights of all citizens. Internally we have democracy, we use democratic standards to work and evolve gradually as a result.

But we have a misconception, and we will correct it. There is a misconception. There is a statutory error. Not a single error. No group is wrong. It is an evolutionary error.

base our decisions on the work of the members. That's right. We are sympathetic figure for those people who watch our behavior, not daring to engage in daily functioning. It is a common reaction in all societies.

This social power base by supporters as the first entry is key to understanding the way in which democracy walks, to know address social needs of democracy.

And yet, we are not paying attention. That must change. We

group of members who build their time effort and money the future of PIRATA. And we also have a group of supporters who can tell us where we are, as we sail and what direction. Just outside you can see our progress. From within our vision of a one-way and with little depth. We get lost in the immensity.

We use the external links, the supporters, to know what we are doing, what we are failing, and what should be our priorities.

The construction of our statutes is strong, takes care of us losing the strength of democracy and keeps us and dilapidated enthroned ourselves. Is an asset that we must take care with the utmost respect. We create queries

constant supporters, asking what's wrong with our system, to be critical of ourselves, activate all the mechanisms of democratic development.

Survivabilitygleesens 8 Prostate

Democracies and votes

The effective democratic development based on mutual cooperation of members of society. To this end, the company provides various means of communication in both directions to be continually recreated. When a party fails to deliver is lost the connection and goes democratic collaboration.

Therefore, the more communication between both parties there will be more entrenched democracy. If you believe a democracy can work together with citizens once every four years versus one capable of doing it once a week, it is clear that the latter will be more democratic and more social than the first.

citizens as members of democracy are the engine of democracy, but what happens when the government is inhibited from working with people? What happens when people are inhibited from working in government?

First question: what happens when the government is inhibited from working with people?

create a democracy is dictatorship. The objectives of the government are no longer the need for citizens. The government lost the social purpose with which he was born. When you try to citizen inquiries compromising the answer, do simple queries so that the citizen is locked in its decision and break the communication channel. To destroy government communication with citizens is an economic gain.

Second question: what happens when people are inhibited from working in government?

First, you lose the social debate, the government ceases to be objective in their thinking and only sees the economic success of society as a democratic goal. This could be further from the initial social objective of any democracy. Then, citizens (due to lack of social recognition from the government) see a democratic setback, attend to a loss of freedoms and rights and choose to follow the democratic path without access to government. The people cut off communication with the government and act outside of it. Even when respondents have access to respond. For a city to destroy the communication with the government represents a separation of his captors, is a freedom without constraints.


The right to non-voting

Thus we see that today's democracies lose their efficiency in the attempt to access the city, but there is no flip side, there is no loss of government benefits, in contrast, always give loss of connection as a social problem and not a government problem. Not so in the city, the city acquired in the non-voting the right to freedom, not to feel a captive of a government that believes in solving basic problems for society and citizens.


PIRATA movement and the right to non-voting.

In PIRATA complicate things, we have channels to ensure that representatives did not cut the connection with citizens, we have considered not only the voters of PIRATA is accusing the rights and freedoms we defend, but we believe that the rights and freedoms that every human being (see Universal Declaration of Human Rights ) representation obtained as a benefit for society. PIRATE never be inhibited social contact. Social contact is the target of pirates, their movement.

PIRATA have broken in the pursuit of a manifesto (translated economically) in the achievement of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a social stronghold. The ultimate purpose of PIRATA is to be in government, is only a tool to make the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is imposed as a democratic order.

And this has led to the first sociological problem unresolved. The distance to the citizens, their passivity in politics. We intend to create a mutual partnership with the city (some would call Direct Democracy, Democracy other fluids, etc..) And we know we must go beyond that barrier with which we have found to achieve our goals. Now begins our struggle: to get society to get involved with PIRATA social objectives. PIRATA is not intended to govern election effort. We know that one of the possible angles of PIRATA is to organize society (even outside of the polls) to sue and get a functioning democracy in all its aspects and everyday moments of all citizens.

Our first hurdle was the lack of internal motivation, in other organizations make up for the lack of motivation to a large degree of freedom in the head of the party. In PIRATA always room for maneuver is democracy. So we are at a moment that will be a major effort to revive itself within PIRATA PIRATA.

Now, we are investing the effort in getting PIRATA in democratic tools democratic deactivate inhibition of the members of PIRATA. For this, the first question that it is: How to get the right to non-vote does not become a brake on democracy?

The right to non-voting is an act that every citizen must be maintained. No system can void the no-vote. Eliminate the right to non-voting means eliminating the right to live according to their conscience. PIRATE

the solution should focus on preventing the brake that is the right to non-voting, but to replicate in the system the right to non-voting as an integral and positive, and thus citizen trying to get what is wrong and what is damaging to the system in order to reconsider the mistakes and correct them.

First, it established that while all else fails, the right to non-voting to be inalienable, can not be canceled or punish the non-voting right.

As a second point of action might be possible to define all the possible voting options to understand social forms of life in society. Not all see the same need for action in the ratings, nor are all dressed alike, nor do we have the same need for food, medicine, art, etc.. Everyone is different. And this differentiation is the union of all, respect for that distinction is what democracy will evolve positively in PIRATE. The attraction of any person for the right to non-voting is even a lack of social incentives in the system, getting to combine in different views to vote and consequently that such misfortunes are reflected in the social movement would be a major task to stop the no-vote in a democratic society established.

third point, note that when a motion PIRATA full range of variables defined within democratic citizens any action that inhibits the contact will be, paradoxically, the social death of PIRATA. And would be seen as a third point attempt reconnection to the social order, to return to recover the link with the city.

insist that is not a social problem, not even the city, but loss of contact between the movement PIRATA and the public. Wake


social connection.

There is only one way to revive the social connection: with social contact. Reactivation

social contact is one of the priority tasks of PIRATE at this time.

Once again we get in touch with society and bring them back to hear their proposals through our channels, we will only verify that the communication has been restored successfully. This has re-der to be through exchange of information. Reset

voting system as austere as possible, join forces in the city feel comfortable exercising their right to vote, and finally getting to accept social dialogue between pirates and the public.

democracies are not exercising their right to vote is considered an attack on democracy, ranging from simple disrespect of not complying with an inalienable right, to lose social rights or economic penalties.

I do not believe in such aspects. The right to no-vote is the right to strike. When all else fails we can only sit back, and if he has control criminalize us to act in this way then we no longer have neither the freedom to think.


vote or not vote: the same right

ends here, for the speech. Get the citizen vote will only be possible if you get with it a benefit. Getting

vote without social constraints, is also an exercise in democracy and tolerance.

and access your vote casting as a receipt of social identity is the difference between a democracy a democracy alive and dead within a government intolerance in their laws.

be receptive to the vote. Accept the critical vote, one that tells us what is wrong, accept in the voting comments or complaints. Accept the positive feedback that indicates that the system works but has no desire to decide, which focuses on the continuity of the system, with changes that other citizens freely decide. Internet

us about individuality in the set. Accept all aspects of the vote will give us the strength to continue fighting for democracy.

: ·)

Bestway Air Mattress Replacement Plug In Stores

ONYX IN CANYON

Does Swollen Ankles Mean

Democracy Looking for the beginning

The first thing to note is that the basis of humanity is the socialization of individuals. And today, there are many problems in our society. Perhaps finding the beginning of the problems can give us guidance in resolving today's democratic inaction we are.

The first hominids began to socialize in small groups of 10-20 individuals, well, I will not go around the bush, I will explore some more.
In the first
sedentary tribes which began to grow crops and graze their cattle groups were organized as self-sufficient, and for this, each group member was responsible for a "job" or primary discipline.

would farmers, pastoralists, and craftsmen.

not forget to quote two of the works that have always cohesive groups, without including the maintenance unified group and its evolution would have been unthinkable. Namely:
women and the elderly.

is not trivial. The absence of one of them would make the group disappear. The cause of disappearance could be segregation nonunion through the harmonization of society by women, and the other cultural death in the disappearance of the elderly. Clearly

could have famine, attacks, etc. But that unforeseeable factors (not quite, but is not the time to talk about it.)

Take one at a time situations:

elders. At one time an individual could no longer deal with the energy of his work, had two choices: go away socially or reinvent their social role.
Thus, an elder has a tool you have a young, experience, wisdom, collective memory, ..., in short: information vital for the survival of the group culture.

women: motherhood. The key point is this. About motherhood happen countless jobs, all with the common denominator of socialization. It is therefore through the mothers are able to create a social society.

In both cases we see none of the two groups performed a task with tangible results. They are therefore the beginnings of trade of the intangible, of virtuality.

also noteworthy that both works are unique and not interchangeable, not like other jobs. This leads to the first of the misconceptions of society: the belief that a unique specificity in a study to believe that the individual who performs it can only access this performance. False. Not the guy who only knows the position, but rather, is the work which only accepts a type of individual as valid.

This conceptual failure remains today.

The second error is inherent in the socialization to perform work intangibles society perceives them as secondary and unnecessary, therefore, evolution is responsible for burial in a class lower than other areas of work.

But evolution had saved more surprises.

From now on I will refer to groups and families.

At the time that groups become more numerous (because of the union of several families) is when you begin to see the need for collaboration among all families. This need for collaboration among all of them rise to the first "political office." Here the elderly will participate, outpacing the rest of classes. From here
already facing three classes: a.
Women (by socialization). B.
Workers (in charge of the economy). C.
The elderly (by culture and information).

A. Women: This class as responsible for the maintenance and cohesive society acquires a power of intangibles very strong. This class is responsible Fixing the "social system." What we understand as "officials."

B. Workers: This class is responsible for keeping the group, their performance has a tangible value. Today we can represent it as "the economy."

C. Seniors: This class will be the most evolve. Be subdivided into several sub-classes, each acquiring different values:

Culture => Information => control decisions in these subclasses

can be perceived as the highest flow control is on the individual who takes decisions. Today represented by the "government."
This sub-class needs to be constantly watching what happens, which established a system of information and control. Today represented by the "forces of the state."
And finally, the sub-class that ensures that everything remains on the pace, closely monitoring the source of information: the group's culture. Today represented by "education." ***



The government has to stay active, avoiding crumbling all, in principle good of the group, but later with the aim of good government.

The government will act aggressively:

Thus, the class "society" demonize it to prevent further collect control.
A class "economic" force her to pay the social debt (existing only in the mind of the government.)
And finally to the class "education" will marginalize their knowledge so it can not know what is happening.
In this last section arise about cultural trends in society that rejects the government's control over culture. So free culture becomes counter-culture (culture = government) or as they say in the government now: in pirate culture.



*** We have identified the origins of current problems. Try to find solutions.

1. To remove the power of governments is to remove their control of culture, so that the counter-culture (anti-culture = anti-government) to become free culture without censorship. Thus, all laws that criminalize individuals for sharing culture are laws that enshrine the despotism of the government.

2. To restore the vitality of market economy should be separated by social cost.

3. To create a society "social" is necessary to understand a basic concept before: today we are all women. There is no longer the role of "woman" (only mothers and evolving). This means that we are all responsible for the "socialization." Thus we should all take time to socialize. However, the best democracy is the power of choice makes individuals. Choosing to spend time in the "socialization" or invest money in the "socialization" has to be a personal choice.

White Spotting At 38 Weeks Pregnant

alive, what the link with the future?

The company bases its efficiency on the unity and cohesion of all its members. No matter the economic, cultural, geographical or otherwise, the result always be beneficial for those who keep society running.

Throughout history has created an awareness of society in which the acceptance of human beings began to the hand that had control of God. Gradually this circle of "human friendships" was growing in such a way that generated a large group of humans who maintained control through religion and inevitably with the power that gave him the god of earthly possessions giver. No wonder, therefore, that the lives that were in their hands have no value, were not even human.

To achieve the humanization of all members of society begin to wonder who is free and what rights. Classes start wars and fight to end slavery. Achieve the humanization was the end of non-democracy.

god credits were gone. The debt is huge, a whole world for their goods that are controlled by a few winners.

Now, who inherited these credits must struggle to avoid losing them. Citizens, which are human, free and rights, agree to live in society and organized. This will require establishing performance standards, and are best adapted to the new reality that has always worked: delegate to God the future. continue working with this premise states a greater or lesser extent.

But something does not work, what happens in an integrated human society is unable to achieve their goals?

Society is enclosed within a herrático and disproportionate. Treat humans as raw material, does not consider the system weakens or strengthens the position of some humans against others. The laws are becoming painful and perverse in state hands.

The state does not accept the humanity, all human differences that make it diverse.

The state creates a blank slate where to measure and blame the vast majority of humans. There are just laws condemn as much money to different persons without considering the effect of the penalty for each person. Laws dehumanize society.

Thus, society can only humanize gaining control of the laws, observing, recollecting, discussing, motivating, evolving the state with the law through social contact.

society (human) is aware of it, but compromised the future of those who control governments and markets. Thus, allowing for time to time decide who represents us is more beneficial than leaving decisions in the hands of citizens, ordinary human.

The power required to have control, the longer and longer in control without interference from the citizens most beneficial to the ruling class.

Direct Democracy solves many of these "undesirable damage", the government remains vigilant, and at the same time, the state is consistent with the public. Citizens can act to make changes to laws that do not like, and at the same time, there are laws that can not be done (for example, changes in the constitution) if not through public consultation.

But there remain major fronts where no direct democracy can work.

Direct Democracy is the format in which the state establishes a connection with citizens, allowing them to correct the bad behavior of governments. Direct Democracy offers a safe way to verify and unite social consciousness, creating the possibility of generating the necessary discussions to find the best solution to a problem by all citizens. The format of Direct Democracy needs to use time properly, giving enough time period so that you can generate discussion in society. However

today is a time lag. The time needed by the government to use the power of negative and the time that a democracy has to counter is a huge gap, even in a direct democracy. The same tool that offers a guarantee of properly functioning direct democracy is that which obstructs the social efficiency of a bad government: time. Today, time is key. The world is moving at breakneck speed, requires only a few days or weeks to change the course of a government without citizen involvement.

To this we must add the evolution cultural society facing the state and the established government. You need to understand that society is the fruit of the culture of its peoples. Therefore, people who have little experience with democracy will be more reticent and reluctant movement to people with high self-governing democratic experience. This does not mean they do not know to decide. This decision leads to fear, a people who have suffered from authoritarianism is a prisoner of fear to think, but he knows what he wants. Thus, self-confidence, self esteem, motivation, and ultimately, social and political culture of the people must move forward to not be afraid to make decisions, to engage in self-government. Here

we have one of the biggest challenges: getting society to speak without fear through its citizens.

Direct Democracy is an indispensable step to achieve that purpose, but we are still awaiting the final step to perform: instant self-government.

is easy to think that it is impossible to reach this kind of self-government. It is easy to believe that direct democracy is the ultimate goal of a democracy. But getting the company rise, ensuring that society is alive politically, in short: get a Living Democracy, is a goal that is within the scope of this world.

now in the XXI century we have the tool fundamental uncensored information instantly through the network of networks, internet.

capture options for self-government are viable, the benefits are for all the disadvantages for those who lose control of the government, politicians and financial markets.

Liquid In Swollen Finger

thank presentanción attendance of the Journal building in ONYX Café-Bar Zela on Friday 10 September.

Here, a chronicle by Cesar Klauer .

Best Time To Wax Legs Shower

ONYX AT CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY

Sending An Air Guns To Canada

PRESS RELEASE NUMBER 2

Ndp. 02

MAGAZINES ÓNICE EN EL CAFE-BAR Hysni

Lima, 07 September 2010

On Friday September 10 will present the fourth issue of the Journal of ONYX creation in the Café Zela Bar, Av Nicolas de Pierola 961, Plaza San Martín, Lima Center. The event will be held at 8 pm The panel presentation will be headed by Paul Guillén, poet and journalist, will accompany and Benjamin Sandoval Cesar Valdivieso, director and editor of ONYX, respectively.

In this fourth edition will find collaborations such as: a poem of the last poems of Carlos López Degregori, generously provided by him for ONYX, a narrative essay on Mauro Puna Mamani Macedo and a fairy and a Mazeyres Orlando interview with Jorge Eslava, among others.

creation ONYX Magazine is an editorial project managed and led by the group ONYX, a group founded in late 2005 by students of the Faculty of Arts at the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. It aims at dissemination of literary practice and as the reflection on the literary work in general

appreciate your dissemination

For more information contact:

Website : http://revistaonice.blogspot.com/

Group E : onicegrupo@gmail.com

Best Camera Pack For Hiking

FIRST PRESENTATION OF ONYX No. 4

HOUSE OF LITERATURE

Thursday, 2 September

appreciate the presence of the renowned poet Victoria Guerrero. On the right, ONICE editor, Benjamin Sandoval, left side ONICE director, Cesar Valdivieso.

can also find more information at: XPRESSARTE

Shiny Pokemon Fire Red Cheats

Second presentation of ONYX No. 4

About Paul Guillén (Ica, 1976)
studied literature at the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. TRANSFORMCIÓN published poetry books THE METAL (tripod, 2005) and SECRET HISTORY (AECI-Lustra publishers, 2008). Has been included in anthologies of poetry published in Mexico, Peru, Argentina, Brazil, USA, Sweden, Ecuador and Colombia. His poetry has been translated into Quechua, Portuguese, Czech and French. Gesture anthologies made Julia Ferrer (2004, co-authored with Renato Gomez) and contemporary Peruvian poetry. 33 poets, 70 (2005). He has also published essays and interviews on Peruvian and foreign poets in journals such as Tse-Tse, Galerna, Hispanic poetry review, Letras.s5, Guaraguao, Martin, among others. Currently a member of the Editorial Committee of The Pool of Lucretia (Mexico), the Advisory Council of Metropolis magazine (Mexico), Zero Hour Movement, editor of the cultural section of the Peruvian news portal and directs the blog, magazine and publishing black sun .

Olay Vs Loreal Vs Garnier

The planet Gaia and their futures. Employment

James Lovelock in 1969 enacted its theory of the existence of the earth as a system called Gaia, a living system.

Now, we understand perfectly that broke the barrier in 1969. Now consider what we do in the world affects the whole planet. It is a logical situation and accepted.

understand perfectly that Gaia has to be an ecosystem systems that act like any other body.

All this I understand. But what are the future for Gaia? Could the future? "Several future?

begin assessing reality. A system that only has the option to make a decision is facing two futures: one in which the decision and another in which no decision is made. Both situations may generate future the same or different depending on other parameters. But there are now two possibilities, not just one, so there in the moment before making a possible decision two possible futures.

Gaia, as a body, should live according to their body and mind. Yes, there are many distinctions about what is a mind in all species, some more evolved than others, but have minds. So, Gaia, do you think?, Do you mind?

If we consider that the parties beings or individuals within Gaia is the entire body, we understand that each cell acts like a great system Gaia. Where we put the mind?

back a bit. A person has a conscience, a group of people united socially create emotional bonds, economic, social, etc. Are linked. Therefore, the action of one of the individuals driving the response of other individuals, and thus, they activate individual to individual fields of action a social group. Together they create a social movement that could be called as initial axiom or cultural link, so we could understand the cultural nexus as the established culture in some individuals. Each culture would (under this concept) an initial axiom or be "culture" to understand it as an entity that generates thought.

Viewed this way, each to be "culture" is a part of the thought of Gaia, each to be "culture" is one of the possible future of Gaia. Or all future.

currently disquisitions enter more mundane. If we understand that "cultural beings" define the movement of ideas within Gaia, we understand the relationships between each of the "cultural beings" affects Gaia's emotional performance.

Thus, the relationships between different cultures are evidence of the future that awaits Gaia.

But there is a disquisition on this. The world is not divided into "cultural beings", the world is divided by borders, and this marks the performances of the "cultural beings." The existence of borders causes the continuing struggle for the maintenance or improvement of the status of borders through each of the "cultural beings." Clashes. Forces clash within the mind of Gaia. Ultimately violent future.

However, understanding the relationship between "cultural beings" could be cumulative, cooperative, entendemiento and cooperation, gradually dissipated the need to maintain boundaries, the need to maintain power for control of territory.

But it is not easy. There are "cultural beings" (if you really believe that there are) stronger and more weak, you have to die with his last cell (or person), and some that are born through the union of different cultures and their mix .

The "cultural beings" are not destructive, however, the cells that compose it may be more destructive in some than in others. But make no mistake, look where the spring is active destructive phase in the cells, look for why a cell changes its behavior, find out what caused your negative. Thus, cells can return to their natural state positive. More difficult is to get a "culture be" re-establish its pre-war status. But not impossible.

So why the "cultural beings" face? Why borders? Protected from being menacing threat.

If we could eliminate, or better, go sifting and dissolving boundaries, the "cultural beings" would lose the need to threaten at all costs. If "cultural beings" is more lively mix will break boundaries and dispel the threat, no need for destruction neighbor.

So what would be achieved with the elimination of borders? Sorry, rephrase the question: what would be achieved with the elimination of nationalism? Cultural mix, new "cultural beings" with new future.

If nationalism were disappearing, cultures of all peoples would gain, the Gaia system would no longer face an uncertain future and, quite possibly, humans begin to live without war. The

nationalism are the past and present, are a source of wars. Preparing for a nationalism is to prepare for a future war. Debate is to succumb to the threat or threat.

The future is a mixture, the future is the people, the future society.

: ·) elferrer 09/03/2010

Record Propellerhead Craigslist Ca

, the bitter side of governments

create societies governments to achieve common goals for all citizens: to live. Make no mistake, the companies do not create governments for war but peace.

Therefore, the cost on citizens to be left to govern: to assume defeat, to negotiate life. Today

no government bankruptcy. I'm bold, I know. To begin we must understand what the government rather than treasure, after that, we can assess your situation.

The evolution of societies has been marking as the power has been stabilizing and anchoring through one of the most immutable properties exist today: the gold. Thus, there is collective awareness that "money" (gold currency) is the foundation of society and state, in short, the tool of governments.

Since children have learned to value our possessions, we know that when we borrow and we can not return it we are doomed to oblivion and disappearance, social death. And under this premise we all parameters with which we assess our environment and actions.

So why governments fail? Why not get out of his supposed final crisis?

will have to attend several parameters, the first money. Governments are fuzzy entities (although unfortunately there are usually always the same faces) designed to survive all disasters. They must buy their survival as individuals, but not with the same currency as the latter. Governments buy their survival money. They must keep the system afloat monetary bankruptcy, how to get there to the extent of the crisis and even a little more, to come out stronger. Monetary relations are really simple: there are individuals with little money and financial markets are a lot of money. Governments should ensure that only the balance is always in favor of financial markets, adding their coffers.

The flow of money must be kept from the bottom (low purchasing power) up (financial markets), thus creating a steady flow of money in little hands. It is not that bad or good, but it has a little problem: the gold of the planet is limited. Therefore, maintaining the current down / up the money at the rate which the company can generate profits do go bankrupt social system (understood as all citizens and not as a system of government.) To get to the root of the problem we must understand how it survives the money in the hands of citizens or the financial markets.

begin at the bottom. People in their environment generate social stability (and I said that people need to be living socially), create a stable and secure environment on their terms (cultural factors involved here), once established social environment safely, is when evolve to the next point. At this point social being becomes a being a consumer, which activates the society through the exchange of goods. People engaged in a movement in society, that is the basis of an active and without crisis.

and above. Financial markets need to hoard money. Its structure is maintained with the flow of money. Having money is not his destiny. The fate of the financial markets is always cumulative. Financial markets do not spend, do not buy. Financial markets use markets to draw from them social benefits, income. Even charge for their action to reap the benefits of society. But all legal huh? No censorship, no drugs, no money laundering, corruption-free planning, without ecological bankruptcy. All legal, again. As I was saying, having money is not his destiny, his destiny is to have the entire market. Therefore, the need for the market (the money is only the tool) should maintain control of the tools (money) and not lose control of it. This can only be achieved in one way: remove the money from the social flow. When one gram of gold falls hands of the financial market and does not return to "down" to the underworld of people.

At this point I can finish the approach: the social crisis is determined by the loss of benefits in people, this implies an excess of profit in financial markets, a enquilosamiento of power in few hands. No retreat. The output of the social crisis disappears just as society itself is capable of self-generating a new feasible to generate profits. Financial markets are not those who do, are simple people, these people like the reader who only understand to survive.

And now we come to governments. I was saying earlier that governments are not in crisis. I know that all (Or nearly all) are already hands on the head (crazy!). Governments are not marketed with money. Governments marketed with human lives. Governments sell life and its benefits. A government's hands are nothing but ignorant voters, cannon fodder, mob, in short: the pen from which to draw benefits.

A government hands are a raw material, yes, with power to create profit.

Knowing that we are a raw material, the government is left alone to get the most benefit from it. Interestingly, the more feeds the machine that runs the government (officials) is less resistance to social brokenness. So the more "socialist" is a more controlled society has the forces of change. But make no mistake, the more "capitalist" more control you have over the citizens' purchasing power. Thus, both extremes are detrimental to the evolution of a balanced society for citizens.

We find the average.

and employment, governments can not control the job because successful sacrifice by citizens, success through financial markets. And sooner or later, financial markets, engulf the employment benefits that keep moving.

If there is money in the hands of citizens is employment, if the money is moving to monopolies, corporations, ultimately, into the financial markets, then it destroys jobs.

government's currency (as we know) are people. Governments are not in crisis because they still have to create a corral full benefits.

The crisis is in every single citizen. The government only tries to allowing people into the corral.

: ·) elferrer 09/01/2010