not ceased to amaze me to see in the news program of Channel 13, a note that talked about Kate Middleton, William's future wife, which is alluded to she did not have "blue blood." "Blue blood? What a newscast in 2011, in the XXI century?
the British revere his family unfortunately real may be somewhat understandable due to the strong tradition surrounding the monarchy, although almost vomit that no privileged encourage privilege, but a Mexican makes a hunger strike to go to the wedding , I find detestable. A sample of painful voluntary servitude.
So I think even more detestable than the Chilean press, implicitly seek to strengthen a lie, that is the idea of \u200b\u200bthe divinity of some humans, due to the grace of god. Because appeal to blue-blood idea is to appeal to divine law .
No wonder the Catholic Channel intends to appeal to divine law, especially considering that recent developments in Church, more than anyone would have illuminated the mind not to believe in the lie of papal infallibility , and therefore suspicious of any priest who says it is "enlightened by God." Still, the Vatican insists that lie in the blood sacred, and now a little humor circulatory John Paul II will element of worship.
or sacred blue bloods in the main news is simply lying, especially since many of us know that it does not exist, it is a myth, a fallacy. Because unfortunately we know that when Diana died his blood "real" was as red as Dodi Arabic or her driver commoner.
blue blood or divine as news, not report, is to lift a myth that was torn down centuries ago, when the head of Louis XVI shot, splashing a blood red, almost purple, due to the large amount of meat consumed while the people did not even have bread.
Deep and this is key throughout the weeks, the press has revived the principles of divine right, that Locke refuted. Is encouraging the myth monarchical that old lie, even though unfortunately very much alive on the alleged vote-divine qualities of certain leaders and their families, are kings, politicians, priests, or whatever.
Through a wedding, is strengthening the mentality of a vassal, as in force, by which power is exercised not only in monarchies and dictatorships , but also in democracies, making unsuspecting commoners (to call them people, citizens, voters, comrades or subjects) believe that their rulers and leaders are humanly superior, enlightened, who have a unique charisma by which capture the popular will they are infallible, heroes of the fatherland, saviors of the people, or just have blue blood.
And he's done in secret, surreptitious, but simple, appealing voluntary servitude of ordinary people, showing the various souvenirs around the wedding of two young men with blood as red as the rest.
even ridiculously, and appealing to the snobbery chilensis as majority-were shown to be sold in Chile.
And then we complain that the powerful abuse.
0 comments:
Post a Comment